Obama v. Romney (2012)

President Barack Obama lowered expectations for his reelection bid Wednesday, October 3 in the first presidential debate against Republican frontrunner and former governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney.


Obama stumbled through his opening statement as Romney secured his position in the presidential spotlight. Instant post-debate polls from CNN and CBS pointed to Romney as the winner.

DailyBeast columnist Andrew Sullivan characterized the President’s debate performance bluntly saying it was “disgracefully bad,” lazy, dumb, meandering, confused and also that no president has ever “blathered on like that.” Sullivan went on to note that Romney didn’t just win, but he knocked Obama out.


Sullivan and the pollsters must have been watching another debate or maybe they just turned off the TV after the first ten minutes because the President won that debate on the merits of his opponent’s weak argument.

The debate focused on domestic policy and for 90 minutes, from the Magness Arena at University of Colorado, the American public listened to wonky policy talk on spending, entitlement programs, health care, taxes, and shrinking the deficit.

Obama won the coin toss and delivered his opening statement first. He tripped over a few sentences and was unable to deliver his thoughts clearly and concisely. Romney took the upper hand without making a peep.

Romney’s tone was aggressive throughout the debate most notably when he talked over the moderator PBS’ Jim Lehrer on multiple occasions and even threatened to cut PBS subsidies if and when elected. On the fourth interruption Lehrer shot down the governor flat out.

Meanwhile, Obama apologized twice to Lehrer, once for running over time while answering a question and the second for speaking on a topic which was reserved for later in the debate. Also, Obama kept looking down to write notes, which didn’t really exemplify the commander-in-chief persona.

However, Romney took an equally if not more awkward approach at times. When debating, Romney takes a particular stance where he squares his body directly in line with his opponent. While doing this and holding eye contact with the President, Romney referred to Obama twice in the third person (not exactly normal).

Overall, Romney surpassed expectations with his on-stage gravitas but fell far short of selling an inspirational message to win over independent or democratic voters. Although he’s considered a middle of the road Republican, Romney double downed on at least two politically extremist thoughts: 1) he absolutely refuses to balance any spending cuts with tax increases, even by a 10:1 ratio; and 2) his plan to privatize Medicare.

Romney wants to repeal and replace two of Obama’s signature laws, the Affordable Care Act and the Dodd-Frank financial reform law. According to Romney, the first is too powerful and the second is not powerful enough. Is this the republican candidate for President of the United States or Goldilocks?

Obama attacked Romney’s policies for being antithetical to “math, common sense, and our history.” Romney’s answer was simply to deny all the allegations waged against him claiming that Obama was misrepresenting his plan.

So here it is, Mitt’s plan in a nutshell: Forget about raising taxes for the richest 3%. Instead, create incentives for businesses to hire, allowing more people to get jobs, and therefore more taxes get paid. The incentives will be financed through cutting spending programs like NPR (saves $71m annually) and closing loopholes (but don’t ask which loopholes because that’s a secret).

President Obama’s lackluster performance in the first debate may have knocked him off his hopey-changey pedestal but let’s not pretend that that makes Mitt Romney something he’s not and that’s electable. 

No comments: